Mapping Hacks

by Schuyler Erle, Rich Gibson and Jo Walsh

« More on the MacArthur Maze Whose Digital Library? »

Google Earth is still weak sauce

June 8th, 2007 by Rich

In spite of the enormous press, and the pretty pictures, Google Earth represents the pre-infancy of user oriented spatial tools.

I hate to be ‘just’ a freaking whiner…so I have been actively trying to use the darn thing as part of my attempts to collect and manage the raw data from my experiences.

Sadly every time I try to count on it for anything beyond zooming me in to look at part of the world it fails me.

The ‘outrage’ that fostered this particular rant is the completely broken way in which it supports ‘management’ of ‘my places.’
Basically, it just doesn’t work for any definition of work which includes what I consider the bare minimum functionality. The only interface to your data is to organize it hierarchically. And frankly the drag and drop interface is persnikity as hell, and painful to use.

And when Google Earth crashes, which it does for me regularly (though I admit that might be my computer) _it loses my work_.

I don’t want to lose my work, like I just did, because the program crashes. Just save my work, please. Pretty please? Will it help if I beg?

I’m also annoyed that Google Earth seems to ‘think’ that I need to see the ‘featured content’ whether or not I think I want to see it. Sure there is a nice check box, and I regularly click it to hide the damn thing. I have nothing against ‘Featured’ content, except that _it isn’t my content_.

Let me repeat that: All of the pretty pictures and special content is nice. It even has a place, but frankly what I care about is my own content.

Sometimes I want to see what other people think, but mostly I don’t. And it annoys me that every time I restart the program the ‘Featured’ content box has been helpfully checked for me.

I can’t stand investing time in creating, managing and maintaining my own material and then losing my work because the program crashed.

Posted in Uncategorized |

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Trackback from your own site.


3 Responses to “Google Earth is still weak sauce”

  1. MarcGG Says:
    July 12th, 2007 at 8:58 pm

    Hah, these sound like familiar complaints to a regular user of ESRI software.

  2. bdunkins Says:
    July 28th, 2007 at 11:34 am

    Hi, this may be a bit odd to do this here but I don’t really have any other way of contacting you so I will just blurt my questions out here. I’m a student at the University of Oregon and I’m writing this huge research paper on Internet privacy and whether or not it can actually exist in a public forum and I noticed that you made some interesting comments to a blogger on boingboing.net regarding Google’s new “StreetView.” I was just wondering if there would be any way that I could interview you for my project, through either email or over the phone. I’m sorry this is such an awkward way to ask this and I completely understand if you couldn’t be bothered but I just wanted to interview someone with your viewpoints to add them to my paper. So, if you mull it over and decide to help me out, please contact me through email at bdunkins@uoregon.edu. Thanks…and once again, sorry it’s so weird!

  3. SUBIR MITRA Says:
    March 9th, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    WHY NOT RESEARCH TO FIND OUT HOW THE KML CONTENT IS AS PER YOUR NEEDS? We have been converting shapefiles to KML just to add our content but the problem is how to make it dynamic i.e. how to connect it to a local database, so that when that is updated I could see that updated content in Google Earth… may be somebody guides us on KML/XML database connectivity.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).